Manthan Legal Consulting Service

 Introduction: Marital Rape is also known as Spousal Rape, it is the word which has two different words which comes together to make One single word. Each single word has different meaning when compared to Single word. The word Marriage it’s a tie between the two persons. The word Rape is an unwanted sexual intercourse. But the word Marital Rape is sexual intercourse with the spouse without her consent. But the question still arises whether to consider Marital Rape as an offence or Not an Offence.   Historically the marital rape is not considered as a Criminal offence. In the 17 th Century, Chief Justice Matthew Hale established the concept of irrevocable consent, which says that men have a right to have a sexual intercourse with his wife. This has established an exceptional to marital rape. It has believed that ones a girl marries a boy then it is considered a consent for everything including sexual intercourse on this concept the marital rape is not at all in the scenario.  

 Introduction:  In the intricate tapestry of legal contracts, the tools of termination letters and novation agreements stand as pillars shaping the dynamics of business transactions. As an advocate navigating the complex realm of law, a comprehensive understanding of these instruments is paramount. Termination letters serve as formal declarations, marking the conclusion of contractual ties, while novation agreements facilitate the seamless transfer of rights and obligations. This article delves into the significance of these elements within legal contracts and business transactions, emphasizing their pivotal role in ensuring clarity, compliance, and smooth transitions. As we embark on this exploration, the focus remains on the precise crafting of termination letters and the intricacies of novation agreements, both of which play vital roles in the field of law and advocacy. Termination Letters: A Comprehensive Analysis   a. Definition and Purpose: Termination letters stand as formal m

Introduction: The Gyanvapi mosque - Kashi Vishwanath temple case has become a legal labyrinth, intertwining historical narratives, religious sentiments, and constitutional principles. Recent developments in the Allahabad High Court have brought the spotlight on not just the legal intricacies but also the delicate balance between freedom of expression and the need for an impartial trial. In this article, we delve into the unfolding saga, exploring the complex legal landscape and the challenges faced by all parties involved. The court's objection to media interactions adds a layer of complexity, raising questions about the influence of public statements on the ongoing legal proceedings. As the case progresses, it promises to shape not only the historical narrative of the disputed site but also the contours of legal discourse in India. The Legal Quandaries: At the heart of the Gyanvapi - Kashi Vishwanath dispute lie intricate legal complexities that have become focal points of c